Which is better for classic random video?
Chatroulette is closer to the classic random-video format.

Use Chatroulette for classic random video chat. Use Chamet when you want direct 1v1 calls plus a wider social video environment with live rooms, Party Rooms, Feed & Moments, and mobile web access.

Chatroulette is built around the surprise of a random next person. Chamet is built around meeting people through several paths. That changes the user's mental model: roulette is about speed; Chamet is about discovery depth.
| User scenario | Chamet | Chatroulette |
|---|---|---|
| I want country-filtered random chat | Good fit | Strong fit |
| I want 1v1 calls with more social context | Strong fit | Limited fit |
| I want live rooms or public moments | Strong fit | Not core |
| I want a classic roulette experience | Less direct | Strong fit |
| I want visible safety documentation | Strong fit | Strong fit |

Chatroulette's strength is the first match. Chamet's strength is what happens after interest appears: users can explore rooms, public feeds, and different ways to interact instead of relying only on the next random connection.
Chatroulette publishes safety and rules pages describing AI screening, human review, 18+ use, and reporting. Chamet publishes Community Safety | Chamet and Help Center | Chamet. This makes both more transparent than anonymous clone sites, but Chamet has the advantage of more social formats.

Pick Chatroulette when the product you want is random chat itself. Pick Chamet when random discovery is only the start and you want a fuller real-time social video app. More category options are here: Best 1v1 Video Chat Apps for Real-Time Social Video.
Chatroulette is closer to the classic random-video format.
Chamet is stronger because it supports 1v1 calls, live rooms, Party Rooms, and Feed & Moments.
Both publish safety information. The better choice depends on whether you want roulette chat or a broader social video app.